I'm curious about a scenario that I saw this weekend. It was a high caliber travel game in the south,17u, with local (southern) umpires. About 15 D1/D2/D3 coaches in attendance.
A runner was trying to score from third. Thinking that there would be a play at the plate,the catcher partially blocked the plate with his left foot, while still standing.
The throw from the outfield was cut as they tried to get the guy advancing to second.
The runner going home goes into the catchers leg, shoulder first, knocking him down. The catcher retaliates and kicks out at the kid, but misses.
The umpire tosses the catcher but leaves the runner in the game. During the ensuing argument, the umpire acknowledged that the runner came in with his shoulder but that the catcher didn't have the ball. He said he tossed the catcher for retaliating.
The question:
How much contact is permitted at the plate if the catcher doesn't have the ball and is attempting to block? Is the slide or avoid rule an absolute rule? Since a shoulder to the knee was permissible, is an outright barreling over also permissible? Can the runner run right over the catcher with full force? With an elbow to the face? Remember the scenario, the catcher is trying to block the plate without the ball.
IMHO, once the umpire acknowledged that the runner went into the catcher "because he didn't have the ball", he lost his argument and should have tossed both players. He should have lied and said he didn't see the runner run into the catcher.
Just curious. Any umpires please respond.
And NO, my kid isn't the catcher or runner and I'm not the coach.
_________________________
Let it Rip!!!