|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
#7509 - 03/18/10 08:13 AM
Re: Return To Wood Bats
[Re: BeenAround]
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Good Post Spanky, I could not agree with you more! Composite bats have created an undue risk on the field of play. Since the 1970’s aluminum bats hit the market because of their durability, but as technology evolved into lighter alloys and composites, the bats main selling point went from durability to performance. Composite bats offer increased bat speed and a bigger sweet spot allowing the ball with more velocity. It makes hitters look better than they are. Many leagues are adopting policies that ban composite and are returning to wood due to the safety factor. Recently, the New York City Council has mandated that players in all high school baseball games played in the city must use solid wood bats or composite wood bats which are approved by Major League Baseball for minor league use. Catholic Schools are already on board. I also believe that LIBA has banned full composite bats from their league. Below is a link to Bob Salter / Rick Wolff (right side of screen) WFAN broadcasts. Once you click on the link you can locate the Rick Wolff archived broadcasts related to the issue of bats that I have listed below. Under each broadcast listed click on DOWNLOAD and Windows Media will pop up and play the show. http://www.wfan.com/pages/3341990.php10/25/09 Show - Death by aluminum bat: the Brandon Patch case against Louisville Slugger 08/09/09 Part Two - A call to arms: Why the NCAA wants to ban composite bats in college baseball 07/26/o9 show - The dangers of High School softball: Composite bats, the pitching rubber distance to home plate, and the use of face masks. What parents, coaches, and girls should know. Curt Schilling - The future Hall of Fame pitcher discussed sports parenting with Rick, including his views on aluminum bats, curveballs and kids, specialization in one sport, and more.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#7521 - 03/18/10 03:29 PM
Re: Return To Wood Bats
[Re: Anonymous]
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Maple bats are on their way to being outlawed themselves as referenced by the new restrictions in the minor leagues . Ash and Hickory take years and years to grow . If everyone wants aluminum outlawed expect to pay 150 or more per stick , that could break right out of the box . A better solution is to review how the new bats are certified . A new bat hits the market and is in a kids hands way too soon . Hybrids , doublewalls and hollowcap bats are the main culprits. I recently found my brother's aluminum bat from college which he used in the first year they were legal. The bat walls had to be a 1/4" thick. I held it next to the high tech lightsaber my son uses and it's evident that money and technology are responsible for the injuries not that the bat is aluminum. We just need a better governing board to regulate what is safe. Here is the real problem: Jack MacKay joined Louisville Slugger in 1989 and was put in charge of designing a high-performance aluminum bat to catch industry leader Easton. Mixing space-age alloys and creative engineering, MacKay developed high-priced, high-profit models that left wood in the dust. "This is the kind of technology you ought to be throwing at bin Laden, not some baseball pitcher," he says today. "We've over-engineered it. It's the worst thing I ever did. Aluminum bats and wood bats are not even in the same ballpark." To be approved, an aluminum bat must not cause a batted ball to travel any faster than the best wood bat does. But there's a catch: Bats are tested in a laboratory on a machine set at a 70 mph pitch speed and a 66 mph swing speed. Why not test at far more realistic numbers, say, 85 mph pitches and 80 mph swings? Simple, says MacKay: "It would scare people to death." Why? Reaction time. Experts say the fastest batted ball a pitcher can defend against is about 97 mph. Translation: Less than four-tenths of a second. Ninety-seven mph also is the fastest a ball can be hit by a certified bat in the lab test. Sounds safe, right? But what about on the field? Well, it turns out nobody officially tests balls hit by aluminum bats under game conditions. "We've seen some things on our radar gun--108 miles per hour, 110 at different times," says the University of Minnesota’s baseball coach John Anderson. "I've witnessed 114 myself. Makes you question whether we are doing the right thing?" "Let's be honest," says Anderson. "Bat manufacturers have been wonderful for college baseball. So you get caught up in that, the free product, the fact it's saving you money. But all of a sudden I see my young man lying on the ground, and I'm going, `Is this the right thing?'" There is one man at the University of Massachusetts Lowell baseball research center who works in the lab and does all the testing, Professor + Director James Sherwood who has denied numerous times to comment on the issues of aluminum bats. Still, Sherwood sure did some talking back in February 2000, when he wrote a memo to the NCAA saying he was "genuinely concerned that someone is going to get seriously hurt and potentially killed" with a bat certified in his lab.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#7528 - 03/18/10 05:06 PM
Re: Return To Wood Bats
[Re: Anonymous]
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The problem is much deeper then that and a lot more complicated and I think we all know that. The bottom line is how exciting the games have become which is big business. I mean the Little League World Series because of the bombs has change the face of the game. Its got more kids involved and made Little League much more money and the game has gained interest all over the globe which is what we want kids playing baseball all over the world. Besides the fact you think all these companies will be around if all bats are the same plane jane metal or wood? Of coarse not. So lets be real, besides wood bats are just as dangerous especially with the maple spear or ash splinters which will happen if kids use bats regularly since parents will not buy a lot of them to keep them fresh. So you will have a bunch of old broken down bats on the field just waiting to hit someone in the face. Now I like wood and wish there was a wood league for little guys, I always have so don’t think I’m against the wood, just realistic that the game needs all bats.
Now no body wants to see anyone get hurt and the truth is all bats all ready have a BESR rating for this very thing. I think the whip in the handle is more the problem then what the compound is of the bat. I mean they rate the BESR and then from what I understand have a rating for handle whip but don’t do any test on seein gif the combination has helped exceed the BESR rate.(but not sure)I’m also not a big fan of them making such a large drop bat. So the combination I think is what the problem is. That and the fact kids are getting stronger and faster and nowadays these kids who play are playing all year round. I mean most little leaguers play a pro schedule with training and all types of nonsense. So no matter what you stick in these kids hands if there getting bigger and stronger and faster there’s no bat saving anyone.
The thing is there are things you can do. One stop making drop 13 bats period. Change the drop rule to youth being drop 10 at most on a 60ft field. Then change the age and base paths for 12 and 13 year olds to play at 70 foot fields(even have league start building these fields), maybe even 11,12 and 13 playing 70 foot and 50 pitch. Now with all 70 ft base paths the drop should only go to drop 5 no more then that. This would also give all these kids a great transition to the 90ft in high school. Then of course 90ft with drop 3 but I think you lower the chances of someone getting hurt be putting distance to react between players and the ball. I say this because most little leagues still play 60 ft at age 12 with 45ft pitch and that’s dangerous and always has been. Kids are too strong, and not only at the plate but some of these pitchers throw pretty hard and at 60 ft it looks like 90mph. So yeah we add crazy foot ball style cages to our helmets which I think is good but not something I would want any kid to get used to especial as they get older. Plus that cage on your helmet doesn’t save your kidneys, your neck, back, leg and you get it.
So I say make the field transition that fit’s the size of that age group and start doing 70ft at least 12 and 13 years old. It will also save kids arms that at 12 and 13 are pitching from 90ft which is retarded, and trying to throw across the field.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#7567 - 03/19/10 08:37 PM
Re: Return To Wood Bats
[Re: Anonymous]
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
For those of you who ever played with a wood bat the selection steps were very basic and benign; weight, length, feel of handle. The main criterion for buying a composite/metal bat today is: which one gives the best pop, and bellyaches about how much they cost. It's not about the art of the game, it's about "turbo-charging Johnny" with technology so that he can hit the ball harder, farther and more consistent with a bat that has a much bigger sweet spot, We should all recognize the truth for what it is. On another matter, there used to be an art to breaking in a glove and building a customized pocket, even that is lost in today's game. I understand that change happens and is part of life, but we should resist when it compromises safety. I, for one, am willing to accept the trade-offs that come along with bringing us to a better place.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#7968 - 04/01/10 10:49 PM
Re: Return To Wood Bats
[Re: Anonymous]
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Reported from a source with an admitted point of view...
A study from the National Center for Catastrophic Sports Injury Research shows that there have been only 15 catastrophic batted ball injuries to pitchers out of more than 9,500,000 high school and college participants since 1982.
During the last five years a number of states, individual organizations, city councils, and others have proposed the banning of aluminum baseball bats on a number of different levels. These actions have typically been in reaction to a catastrophic injury as opposed to being based on creditable injury data or research.
In May of 2002 the Consumer Product Safety Commission stated, “The Commission is not aware of any information that injuries produced by balls batted with non-wood bats are more severe than those involving wood bats”. This statement was true in 2002 and it is true in 2007.
The Medical/Safety Advisory Committee of USA Baseball was initiated due to the lack of injury data needed to make decisions affecting the safety of baseball participants. Prior to 2005 there has not been significant research comparing injuries to baseball pitchers from aluminum bats versus wood bats. In 2005 the USA Baseball Medical/Safety Committee initiated a three year research project comparing line drive baseball injuries to pitchers from aluminum bats and wood bats. Aluminum bat injury data were taken from the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Injury Surveillance System and wood bat injury data collected from college summer leagues (NCAA recognized college summer league teams all use wood bats).
After two years (2005 and 2006) of collecting batted ball injury data to the pitcher from 93 NCAA college baseball teams and 246 college summer league teams, there have only been 17 injuries to NCAA college pitchers and 15 injuries to college summer league pitchers. There were only 32 injuries after 331,821 balls were hit into play. The injuries in the summer leagues, using wood bats, were more severe than the NCAA injuries using aluminum bats. One-third of the summer league injuries involved the head and face as opposed to none in the NCAA. The third year of the study will be completed in 2007.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#7973 - 04/01/10 11:55 PM
Re: Return To Wood Bats
[Re: Anonymous]
|
Hall of Fame
  
Registered: 10/03/09
Posts: 168
|
As someone who began playing at the earliest Little League level and continuing through the college level, I have firsthand experience in the product evolution of the baseball bat. During my high school years (9th through 12th), I went through, at most, 6 wooden bats. At that time, the process for manufacturing bats was more uniform. Maple bats, with their harder and more brittle characteristics, were not in existance, nor were hollow-tipped bats. The bats then had much smaller sweet spots than today. Also then, using a bat weighing increasingly less than 33 oz. permitted more bat speed but seemingly less "pop." In today's metal/composite era, lighter weight with the same powerful material characteristics and a more comfortable barrel to handle weight balance has seriously enhanced the return velocity of a struck baseball. In support of one of my points, I am offering a challenge to anyone/everyone: Go to a sporting goods store, pick out a wood bat and a composite bat of the same length and weight and swing them in an open area. The ease and quicker bat speed will belong to the composite.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#8010 - 04/03/10 09:54 PM
Re: Return To Wood Bats
[Re: Anonymous]
|
Hall of Fame
  
Registered: 10/03/09
Posts: 168
|
Hmmm, let me think over these last few comments. For the person that pays $400 for a bat, he will never have to incur that expense per item again. Regardless of their durable construction, children grow, get stronger, and require bats of different lengths and weights as they mature. As in my home, disgarded metal/composite bats accumulate in a scrap heap that takes up part of my garage. As far as kids losing interest in baseball, and the trend accelerating if wood bats are mandated, I just don't see your point. Lastly, if any kid gets hit in the head by a linedrive by any means, it's a problem. However, you can't equate the risks of using wood and metal as being equal.
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#8342 - 04/13/10 09:36 PM
Re: Return To Wood Bats
[Re: spanky]
|
Hall of Fame
  
Registered: 01/18/10
Posts: 149
|
The standard for Major League baseball is wood. As for the danger that modern composite and metal bats pose, there is no doubt that the ball jumps off these modern high tech bats faster than wood bats increasing risk. Being that said, the NCAA will be altering its standard for metal bats next season, with public high schools following in 2012. New York City Public High Schools and the Catholic Schools have already banned metal and composite bats and have returned to good old fashion baseball with the wood only rule.
While I am a kind of a purest when it comes to wood bats and think that metal and composite should go the way of the dodo bird. However, I think that sensible measures can be taken to allow metal bats to continue to be utilized in youth baseball by restricting the specs in these bats. I also am not naive, I fully understand that wood bats also create a risk when they shatter, especially maple bats. I also think that maple should be removed from the game. Kids and parents alike utilize metal and composite bats because everyone they to see home runs and increased stats. Wood reduces batting and offensive statistics. No kid wants to feel the sting when they mishit the ball with wood. Young players can develop bad habits and a false sense of superiority when using metal or composite. Pitchers do not have enough time to react! Go to a Long Island High School game and watch a Catholic School Team play a Public School Team and tell me who hits the ball further, but then watch the Catholic Team play more fundamentally sound offensive small ball. Another factor to consider is that today’s kids are stronger and more powerful today compared to years past due to more attention and detail given to better conditioning, weight training, and instruction. Bigger and better players produce pitchers who throw the ball harder with more velocity and hitters with greater bat speed resulting in a well hit baseball that has a lot more velocity off of the bat resulting in the increasing risk of injury. This is an interesting debate, but my opinion is that we should return to wood only for the sake of safety!
|
|
Top
|
Reply
Quote
Quick Reply
Quick Quote
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|